Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Sleuth outwits Sotheby’s in £750,000 art coup


Richard Brooks, Arts Editor
AN expert from the Antiques Roadshow has identified an unknown landscape put up for sale by Sotheby’s for between £10,000 and £15,000 as one of the earliest works of Thomas Gainsborough, worth £750,000.
Philip Mould pieced together clues that convinced him the painting of a Suffolk view being offered at auction was created by one of Britain’s greatest 18th-century artists.
Mould, who values fine art on the BBC1 show, chose to bid for the landscape over the telephone so as not to attract suspicion.
He paid £50,000 for the painting, which Sotheby’s had described as of “the English school”. It is now valued at about £750,000.
“As soon as I saw an online image from the sales catalogue, I thought it might be Gainsborough,” said Mould. “It was the way the light was painted, and the sandy ground in the foreground, which are trademarks of Gainsborough. But we needed to do some rapid sleuthing before the sale a few weeks later.”
A vital clue for Mould, who runs an eponymously named gallery in central London, was the tiny depiction of a couple at the front of the canvas.
The expert spotted that they looked similar to a drawing Gainsborough had made of himself and his wife Margaret. Now held by the Louvre in Paris, it was created less than a year before the mystery Sotheby’s oil painting.
Working with his colleague Bendor Grosvenor, Mould set about trying to discover the painting’s provenance.
The building on the left of the picture, which shows Ipswich, a mere village in the 1740s, provided another clue.
Christchurch mansion, which is still standing, was owned by the Fonnereau family, who saw Gainsborough, a local teenager, as a promising artist and lent him money to develop his talent. “In return, Gainsborough put the Fonnereau house into his picture,” said Mould.
The BBC valuer and his team of art detectives finally turned to the painting’s records of ownership. In 1824, it was sold for £43 by Evans, a Pall Mall auction house. The vendor was George Nassau, whose father, Richard Savage Nassau, had been painted by Gainsborough in 1750 and was another family friend.
All these clues persuaded Mould to bid for the painting. The fact that its guide price was pushed up to £50,000 suggests other bidders may have also twigged that it could be a Gainsborough.
Mould, who has recently published a book called Sleuth: The Amazing Quest For Lost Art Treasures, cleaned up the picture and showed it to a group of Gainsborough experts, all of whom agreed on its authenticity.
“I simply knew it as soon as I saw it,” said Diane Perkins, director of the Gainsborough House Museum in Sudbury, Suffolk. “The clinchers were the couple, plus the family links with Fonnereau and Nassau.” Two other Gainsborough experts also confirmed it.
Now Sotheby’s could face having to compensate the painting’s vendor for drastically underestimating its worth.

Friday, April 24, 2009

THE GROOVY TWIN

This is a reblog compliments of Shea: Anything

Minneapolis as an Arts Powerhouse? We've known it for years! And MARK ELLWOOD of the New York Post has finally taken notice with his article The Groovy Twin as copied below. We at Shea have loved working on great project such as the Chambers Hotel (discussed below) and our staff can often be found at one of the great jewels this city has to offer listed at the end of the article. Sir Tyrone Guthrie chose Minneapolis for his theater for a reason: It's a great place to call home!

HOW MINNEAPOLIS BECAME AN ARTS POWERHOUSE--

WHEN telling someone to meet you at the upstairs lounge at Minneapolis' Chambers Hotel for a drink, make sure you know you can get away with using the bar's actual name: "Red, White and F-----g Blue."The bleep-worthy bar was personally named by owner and avid art collector Ralph Burnet, an homage to the neon artwork by Brit bad girl Tracy Emin that dangles from its main wall.Bullishly charming -- and himself often Emin-style profane -- Burnet is a real estate developer by trade but has become Minneapolis's homegrown answer to Charles Saatchi.Much of his blue chip collection -- heavy on British YBAs like Sarah Lucas and Gary Hume, as well as New York mainstays like Jude Tallichet -- festoons the walls of his all-white boutique hotel, Chambers. There's a well-respected gallery tucked just off its lobby, showing rotating exhibitions, and Burnet even screens video art in the corridors -- the raunchier stuff's relegated to after 9 p.m. -- allowing interested guests to dial up the sixty odd works directly on their in-room TVs."People invest money here instead of wearing it," he laughs.His love for the arts isn't just a pose: politically active Burnet spearheaded the 'Yes' vote on the constitutional amendment that Minnesota's voters passed at the last election.Economy be damned, Minnesotans agreed to up taxes, raising an extra $80m a year: some of the windfall's earmarked for the environment but the rest will be spent on the arts. If only they could pick a senator as decisively.Burnet's electoral success was significant in many ways. New York may boast about Broadway, big concerts and BAM, but slipping a tax like that past the voters in the Big Apple is all but unthinkable.Voters' enthusiasm in Minneapolis is the clearest sign that the city's reputation as a countrywide cultural HQ isn't all hype and hot air. Many cities outside New York claim that the arts thrive in their regenerated downtowns, but few can back up the claims (take that, Miami).Minneapolis is a very large exception. Playwrights and script mavens have often used it as a base and backdrop, from Sam Shepard and Diablo Cody to the Minnesota-born Coen Bros. Prince and Flyte Tymee - the svengali producers who string-pulled for Janet Jackson when anyone still cared -- are local legends.When a study commissioned by Central Connecticut State University touted a rundown of the most literate cities in America recently -- a study cooked up using bookstores per capita and other ad hoc data -- Minneapolis was a clear first place (twin city St Paul snagged third.) "The Lion King" tried out here in the summer of 1997 at the Orpheum Theater, and most of its cast transferred to Broadway with the show later that year. It's clearly the stuff of local lore: One person boasted, a little too precisely, it was 92 percent of the actors.But unlike New York, with its galleries hunched together in Chelsea and official Theater District, the arts scene in Minneapolis is unassuming and scattered. Galleries and theaters are all too easy-to-miss in that humble, Midwestern way. Strolling around, first impressions of the city are architectural: a slew of well-preserved red brick buildings downtown, so many clock towers that are a holover from the railway heyday and amid the gleaming new skyscrapers downtown, the bizarre but beautiful Foshay Tower. It's a 28-story, deco-era ego trip thrown up by the namesake businessman who promptly went bankrupt and had to sell the pile (it's just been rejigged into an endearingly retro W hotel -- owned by Ralph Burnet, of course).But tucked away amid the soaring buildings there are world class arts institutions, two above all that anchor the city's claims.Originally, the Guthrie Theater and the Walker Center shared a common site, but three years ago the former decamped to a brand new purpose built pile on the waterfront, just after the Walker had unveiled its enormous expansion by Swiss starchitects Herzog and DeMeuron.The Walker, with it 385-seat theater, 40,000 sq foot gallery spaces and 11-acre sculpture garden, is a catch-all monolith that produces dance, performance, plays, films and art shows year-round. The entire operation has just been taken over by a new director, having lured rising star Olga Viso from the Smithsonian last year (Ralph Burnet helped with that, too) Tall, elegant and raved-about by even her rivals, Viso is about to reinstall the entire collection at the end of this year to try to make the Walker even more high profile. She, too, was amazed that Minneapolis's reputation as an arts hub wasn't undeserved. She still marvels at how involved and supportive the local community is."The Walker is deeply held and understood by the community," says Viso. "They may not always like what they see, but they believe it's important for artists to experiment."That live-and-let-live Midwestern-nessess has allowed experimental spaces to thrive here aside from the Walker. John Rasmussen runs Midway Contemporary Art, housed in a low-slung building skulking on a side road in a residential 'hood north of the river; it's a combination art book and magazine library plus contemporary gallery space.Rasmussen was born locally, but worked at a gallery in New York before returning to set up the center in 2001 -- like "The Lion King" transfer, he and his fellow Chelsea-trained galleristas underscore how the Minneapolis arts scene is a feeder for the bigger budgets and egos in New York (no wonder one local nickname for the city is the Mini-Apple) New York looms as large for Tim Peterson, who runs another non profit space on the south side, the Franklin Arts Center.He laughs when recalling how PS1 xeroxed one of his shows six months after it was mounted at the Franklin but gave his team no credit (in the last three years alone, Peterson's sent work from here to the Whitney and Brooklyn museums, as well as pesky PS1). Peterson was another Minneapolis native who decamped elsewhere for training before coming home to the quirky, isolated arts hot house here."Minneapolis is a cultural island. We have our hands waving in the air, saying 'Look at us!' It's part of that crazy Midwestern ethic of 'everybody does well'", he chuckles.But after three days pounding the sidewalks and galleries here, it's evident that Minneapolis's reputation for arts isn't undeserved; but what's harder to Braille is why.One simple reason is money. Dozens of blue chip corporations - more than 40 NYSE members alone -- are headquartered here, and most are famous as companies-with-a-conscience, like Target, Aveda and 3M. Their founders' names (the Target-owning Daytons more than anyone) are plastered on arts projects and plaques across the city.It dates back to the mid-20th century, when those atomic-era cashed-up industrialists felt a civic responsibility to tithe their good fortune back to the city.What's more, arts funding here isn't conditional and money's given without strings, which not only means that more experimental -- read: shocking -- art can be bankrolled (remember Burnet's R-rated Emin) but also that museums' operating costs, from cleaning to staff salaries, can be offset that way.Months after arriving, the Walker's Viso is still stunned at the support her museum enjoys."I didn't realize how deeply the commitment to creating world class things in a smaller city went, that it wasn't surface. And culture is valued so deeply in a mass way -- it's not just a small group of elite people."For example. Viso's Walker is among the top 5 most visited museums in America, though the city's population doesn't break 400,000. (To be fair, the metropolitan area, which includes St. Paul, tops 3 million.) Population is also crucial for its thriving arts scene: just small enough for there to be easy access to the mayor but large enough to reach critical mass.Ironically, though, the real reason Minneapolis has a boast-worthy arts scene may be down to the one thing it's already famous for: terrible weather. Video artist Nathaniel Freeman moved here with his writer wife Emily and he sums it up best."Everyone knows everyone and attends each other's events. They're so supportive. The weather sucks in the winter, which keeps people in their studios, but come spring, the weather is good and the days are so long people want to come out."Translation: six months stuck inside means artists will create things, while six months mingling helps them hype it and make connections over cocktails. No doubt, "Red, White and [Expletive] Blue" is a favorite hangout.

SERVICE ON THE SIDE

There are dozens of must-see arts sights in Minneapolis -- but these are the top 10.1) First Avenue (http://www.first-avenue.com/)A top notch rock venue that attracts every impressive mid-career act that pitstops in Minneapolis - this month, that includes Lily Allen. It's also where the Replacements, Husker Du, Soul Asylum and Atmosphere got their starts.2) Franklin Art Works (http://www.franklinartworks.org/)Opened in 1999 in a onetime porn theater, this 9,000-sq foot building has three exhibition spaces. It specializes in premiering work, with a skew towards black artists like Wangechi Mutu and Kehinde Wiley.3) The Guthrie Theater (http://www.guthrietheater.org/)Founded in 1963, this hotbed of top tier drama is now housed in a purpose-built gleaming black spaceship idling on the side of the Mississippi river designed by Jean Nouvel. The upcoming season, just announced, includes productions of "Macbeth", "A Streetcar Named Desire" and a special stage adaptation of Noel Coward's iconic movie, "Brief Encounter". This summer, the disappointing onsite restaurant is set to be replaced by a Danny Meyer-at-MoMA-like café.4) The High Point Center for Printmaking (http://www.highpointprintmaking.org/)Founded by husband and wife Cole Rogers and Carla McGrath, this is part exhibition space, part workshop. The printmaking complex offers studios for local artists, walk-in sessions for amateurs and an onsite gallery where boldfacers like Carlos Amorales can display their print-making collaborations with the High Point team.5) The Loft Literary Center (http://www.loft.org/)For more than 30 years, the Loft has hosted creative writing classes, readings and bookish events with everyone from Salman Rushdie and James Fenton to the late Allen Ginsberg.6) Midway Contemporary Art (http://www.midwayart.org/)Come here for first exhibitions from emerging artists, both local and national, as well as the chance to browse a raft of arts books and magazines in the roomy library.7) Playwrights Center (http://www.pwccenter.org/)Run by Polly Karl, this lures playwrights and directors to Minneapolis from across the country -- to workshop together in writing labs, and through philanthropy-funded fellowships for specific commissions. There are regular, staged public readings of new plays.8) The Walker Arts Center (http://www.walkerart.org/)The category-killing arts center, it stages high profile visual arts shows - currently, the Elizabeth Peyton round-up that debuted at the New Museum - as well as dance (Merce Cunningham's 'Ocean' project last year in a granite quarry) and experimental theater. A bonus: average ticket prices for performances is only $20.9) The Weisman Art Museum (http://www.weisman.umn.edu/)Housed on the campus of the University of Minnesota in a signature twisty silver Frank Gehry building - it was one of his first museum commissions and he's about to build an extension - this impressive, if smallish, museum has rotating shows as well as displays from a permanent collection that includes Chuck Close, Sol Lewitt and Andy Warhol.10) Radio K (radiok.cce.umn.edu)And don't miss alt-rock Radio K, run by the University of Minnesota, which hopscotches between three different frequencies daily - most think it's thanks to budget problems.

Sunday, April 19, 2009

9 Twitter Tips for Artists

You’ve heard me mention Twitter in the last few posts and it’s been lovely to see a good few artists joining the micro-blogging revolution and following me accordingly. Recently I’ve had a couple of artists ask what they can do to increase followers and therefore push traffic to their sites/Myspaces. So as ever, I looked into those puppy dog eyes and I just couldn’t bring myself to deny you my mediocre-at-best advice. Here are some tips…

(Please note that for hardened Twitter users some of these points may seem a tad obvious so if they do then just shut up and move on to the next point. I love you.)

1) Choose a short name

There is no point having a massive Twitter name as straight away that restricts what people can say to you in replies and therefore may put them off conversing with you which is what Twitter is all about (for me anyway). Remember that your followers have to put their concise witticisms into an already restricting 140 characters so there is no need to confine them further by having a username along the lines of @genericindiebandnameunitedkindgomonlineROFL. Take Sentric Music artist ‘The Second Hand Marching Band’ – they rather sensibly went for @shmb or Tim and Sam’s The Tim and Sam Band with Tim and Sam (which is 39 characters by itself); they’re known on Twitter as @timandsam. Short is sweet.

2) Tell people

Sounds like quite a simple one but it’s quite surprising the amount of artists that are on Twitter but don’t tell their fans. Anywhere you have web presence; MySpace, Bebo, Facebook, mailouts, blogs, email signatures etc put a cheeky link to your Twitter page to encourage people to follow you.

3) Don’t be too self indulgent

I won’t follow you if every tweet is about your music, even if I’m a massive fan of what you do. It’s quite boring. Set yourself a nice little ratio; I’d suggest around 4:1, so for every tweet about your music you tweet four other things unrelated to your artistic endeavours that could be about anything whatsoever. The joy of Twitter is so people can get to know you and your many, many foibles and twittering constantly about how you “just can’t get that middle 8th right” on the new song you’re writing isn’t really going to interest anyone.

4) Talk to people

Someone who just tweets self indulgent sentences thinking they’re some form of 21st century Western haiku making machine is going to struggle to raise followers. Talking to people encourages them to follow you and to retweet you which is one of the best ways to increase followers. Try it now, start something with @sentricmusic and lets have a chat eh?

5) Retweet often

If you read a tweet that either makes you go “Ha!” or “Hm!” (which is the ‘I just learnt something new me’ noise that I’ve mentioned before in previous posts) then retweet it so a) the people who follow you who don’t follow the original tweeter get to make the same noise and b) the original tweeter sees you’ve retweeted him/her and may follow you in return or engage in conversation.

6) Utilise the free Twitter widgets and platforms

Get yourself to Twitter’s download page and go giddy. Get the widget and put it on your MySpace/website so the whole world knows what you’re up to. Also, don’t bother with the Twitter web interface; it’s slow and not very pretty. There are many Twitter platforms available and I’d personally recommend Tweetdeck. It’s quick, easy to use and great for setting up various filters so you can put all of your followers into various categories i.e. ‘Industry’, ‘Friends’, ‘Fans’ etc thus to keep the OCD side of your personality happy.

7) Know what you’re doing

Remember the following:

- If you write a standard Tweet then all of your followers see it.
- If you start a tweet with someone’s username (I.E. @sentricmusic) then the person you replied to will see it, regardless of if they follow you or not, and also everyone who follows both you and the person you’ve replied to will see it.
- If you want to talk to someone without anyone else seeing it then use the Direct Message function.

Learn that and you’ll be fine.

8 ) People unfollowing you isn’t a band thing

Ever hit that refresh button and your followers have gone from 75 to 74?! Don’t panic my good friend, this isn’t a bad thing. People regularly cull followers if their tweet streams get too messy or quite simply you may have just offended someone with that tweet you made about Iraq and Palestine needing to ‘just chill out and relax a bit’. People will come and go so don’t take it personally. Saying that, if your followers drop by about 50% and the other 50% are still only there because they missed the tweet then you probably have done something pretty bad.

9) Aim high now and again

Sentric Music artist Alex Highton (@alexhighton) recently got ‘props’ from Ashton Kutcher (@aplusk - rather suspect American actor who is pretty much now only famous thanks to being married to Demi Moore) who has over a million followers and humble Mr Highton’s MySpace received a lovely surge in traffic. Granted this may be a bit of a one off but why not chuck the odd celebrity a reply in hopes they pick up on your music.
The day Stephen Fry tweets me (@stephenfry) I just may delete my Twitter account as that is the no doubt unreachable zenith I’m aiming for.

Right then, I reckon those nine points should help you on your way to a healthy Tweet life.

I’ll just finish on a few people that you should be following:

@jonathandeamer – Clever bloke who is quite funny when he puts his mind to it
@mr_trick – Regularly tweets about music industry news
@seaninsound – Main guy behind ‘Drowned In Sound’
@dubber – Clever bloke who runs this very useful website
@popjustice – Good source of LOL’s
@sentricmusic – Obviously
@mychemtoilet – Music blog

This is a reblog from the Sentric Music Blog Site.

Thursday, April 9, 2009

Sotheby’s Scaled-Down Hong Kong Sales Yield Mixed Results

HONG KONG—Sotheby’s wrapped up its five days of auctions in Hong Kong with a grand total of HK$691 million ($89 million). The number surpassed the pre-sale estimate of HK$600 but fell well below the HK$1.77 billion earned in last year’s comparable sale. “The financial crisis is still with us, so many potential collectors took a wait-and-see attitude,” Michael Wang, an art collector and chief executive of Humble House Art Space, told Bloomberg. Highlights of the sales, which ran April 4–8 and included 1,700 lots in a variety of categories, were the sold-out wine auction and the record set by modern master Lin Fengmian. Hong Kong is Sotheby’s third-largest market after New York and London. Christie’s holds its Hong Kong sales next month.

Arts Policy: Germany Reaffirms Commitment to Restitution of Nazi-Looted Art

from ARTINFO
The statement came in response to a suggestion by Norman Rosenthal that such works should stay in museums

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Smirking Madoff Portrait for $100,000 Finds No Buyers at Armory


March 5 (Bloomberg) -- A creepy portrait of Bernard Madoff found no fans at the Armory Show in Manhattan yesterday.
The 7-foot-wide black-and-white watercolor appeared to repel visitors right out of David Zwirner’s stand.
“Just look at that smirk,” Zwirner said of the work by Chinese artist Yan Pei-Ming, who based his image on a familiar photograph of the alleged Ponzi meister wearing a baseball cap.
Three hours into the fair’s preview, not a single collector had inquired about the $100,000 price, Zwirner said.
The 11th annual Armory Show on Manhattan’s West Side piers yesterday welcomed several thousand collectors who strolled the stands, many in no particular rush to open their wallets.
“With the economy, I’m not in the mood to buy,” said Phyllis Mack, wife of William L. Mack, chairman of Mack-Cali Realty and chairman of the board at the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation. “But I’m loving looking at beautiful pictures.”
Tennis great John McEnroe cruised the aisles, waiting for something to catch his eye. Was he having fun? “Trying!” he said.
Film director Sofia Coppola, collector Danielle Ganek -- wife of hedge-fund manager David Ganek -- and MSD Capital’s Glenn R. Fuhrman also made the rounds.
Smattering of Sales
Several hours into the opening, there were a smattering of sales and works put on hold, or “reserve,” but business was slower than previous years.
“What is the likelihood we are going to sell everything, like in years past?” asked Marc Glimcher, president of PaceWildenstein gallery. “Nil.”
Glimcher’s stand featured a 20-foot-long $650,000 Alex Katz painting and Tara Donovan’ shiny Mylar sculpture for $150,000.
Pace’s biggest attraction were bowls stacked with free Twinkies, Ring Dings and Devil Dogs.
“It’s for comfort,” said Glimcher, who dressed down in jeans instead of his usual Christian Dior suit. “A little something to take the edge off.”
The fair, which includes 243 exhibitors from 55 countries, opens to the public today and continues through Sunday. Covering 84,000 square feet on Piers 92 and 94, the show is an excellent gauge of the health of the art market.
The subdued mood was a sharp contrast to the fair just two years ago, when frenetic collectors hustled the aisles, competing for the hot and new.
No Frenzy
“There’s no frenzy, it’s laid-back,” said painter Chuck Close, surveying the scene.
He said he expected stronger offerings.
“I thought the quality of the art would bring would be better,” he said. “Instead, some of the galleries have emptied out their backrooms.”
Business was brisk for $12 sangrias at the bar, while at the Ronald Feldman Fine Arts stand, artist Christine Hill role- played as an apothecary, dispensing fake prescriptions and remedies for $20. She had 35 takers by 5 p.m.
Art adviser Elizabeth Jacoby whipped off a pair of oversized sunglasses.
“Forget the recession,” said Jacoby. “We are in it to win it.” She asked for a “happy pill.”
Despite the economic doldrums, there were some quick sales. Nicole Klagsbrun sold Adam McEwen’s orange painting with the words “Pay 1/2 Price,” to a European collector shortly after the start of the fair. The asking price: $6,500. No discount.

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Saint Laurent Art Sale Brings In $264 Million


By STEVEN ERLANGER
Published: February 23, 2009 New York Times

PARIS — Despite the global economic crisis, a lot of money seems to be left over. On Monday, the private collection of Yves Saint Laurent and his partner became the most expensive one ever sold at auction, bringing in more than $264 million on the first night alone.
The only significant failure in the sale, one of six auctions of the collection being held over three days by Christie’s, was an apparently overpriced Picasso from the artist’s late Cubist period. The auction house pulled the work when bids stopped at 21 million euros ($26 million) on a painting that had been estimated at 25 million to 30 million euros.

But records were set for Matisse, Marcel Duchamp, Constantin Brancusi, James Ensor, Piet Mondrian and Giorgio de Chirico. The Matisse, a colorful painting from 1911 of a vase of cowslips on a carpet, sold for $40.9 million, double its estimate.
The auction unfolded in the cavernous Grand Palais in central Paris, where thousands of visitors lined up for hours over the weekend to get a chance to see the collection in what became a kind of temporary museum. Mr. Saint Laurent is regarded with great affection and awe here as a paragon of French style, and he evokes an era when no country could challenge French prominence in the world of fashion.

The Matisse was believed to have gone to an American, but Christie’s refused to identify the buyer. Few Matisse paintings of quality come on the market, and each of the three Matisse paintings did better than its estimates.

A remarkable painting by Ensor, “The Jealousy of Pierrot,” sold for $5.38 million. Thomas Seydoux, a Christie’s expert in Impressionist and modern art, described it as “the climax of Ensor’s work,” and noted that it last sold in 1987 for $700,000. “Those masterpieces are never on the market,” he said.

The Duchamp, “Beautiful Breath, Veil Water,” was a Dada hallmark. Its label depicts the artist dressed as a woman, Rrose Sélavy, a punning alter ego he created in 1920 in a photo taken by Man Ray. It sold for $10.1 million, more than six times the estimate, after a bidding war between two anonymous American collectors. “People had waited a long time for this to go on the market,” Mr. Seydoux said.
Mr. Seydoux accepted some blame for the Picasso’s failure. He said he had based his estimate “on the exceptional quality of that period, but I got carried away.”
Isabelle de Wavrin, deputy editor of BeauxArts magazine, said that while Mr. Saint Laurent loved the Picasso, “Picassos are not rare.”
“But everyone is looking for a good Matisse,” she added.
Jean-Marie Baron, an art dealer who bid on some art but could not afford to go high enough, said the sale suggested that to some extent, “the art market is still good and still strong. Almost everywhere they met the high estimate.”
Pierre Bergé, who was Mr. Saint Laurent’s business and personal partner for many years, said in a brief interview that he was very happy with the results. “But you have to know that I’m very cool about things every day,” he said.
He was more emotional later at a brief news conference. “The day Yves Saint Laurent died, I decided this collection had run its course,” he said. “It was something we created together.” Mr. Saint Laurent died last June at 71.
Mr. Bergé said he explored the possibility of creating a museum for Mr. Saint Laurent’s fashion and art collections but that the project proved too difficult. “Selling it was the only possible solution,” he said.
The proceeds, separate from the commissions that his own company, Pierre Bergé & Associés, will presumably share with Christie’s, are to go to the foundation he established with Mr. Saint Laurent, to various cultural projects, to charity and to found a new research center to combat AIDS. Mr. Bergé said he would keep the Picasso for his foundation.
French museums pre-empted the sale of three works: the record-setting painting by de Chirico, which is thought to be an allegory about the return of Napoleon; “At the Conservatory,” an Ensor satire; and “The Lilacs,” by Édouard Vuillard.
A rare wood Brancusi statue, “Madame L.R.,” originally owned by the artist Fernand Léger, sold for $33.3 million, and it was also a good night for the Mondrian market, with a 1922 composition in white, blue, yellow and black selling for $24.59 million, a record. A monochrome by Mondrian, whose art inspired one of Mr. Laurent’s best-known collections, sold for more than $16.4 million.
The final prices include taxes and the commission paid to the auction house: 25 percent, excluding tax of the first $26,000; 20 percent, excluding tax from that amount up to $1.03 million; and 12 percent excluding tax on the rest. Presale estimates do not reflect commissions.
More than 1,200 buyers, dealers, collectors and wealthy art lovers were in their seats as Christie’s staff members took bids from those abroad on 100 telephone lines. Most of the buyers were said to be American and European.
The sale has five other portions over the next few days, including furniture, silver and Asian art. A dispute has unfolded over two Qing dynasty bronze animal heads, a rabbit and a rat, originally looted from an imperial palace in China but purchased legally. China has demanded their return, but a French court ruled Monday evening that the auction of the heads can proceed as scheduled on Wednesday.
The issue has become a heated one in China, stirring nationalist indignation. Mr. Bergé countered that the heads belonged to him, saying he would give them to China if Beijing would “observe human rights and give liberty to the Tibetan people and welcome the Dalai Lama.”
A Christie’s official then hastened to emphasize that while Mr. Bergé was entitled to his opinion, the auction house had the greatest respect for China and Chinese art. Mr. Bergé, 79, said: “They are my heads. I own them and I said what I meant.”
Before the sale, President Nicolas Sarkozy toured the auction offerings, and accepted from Mr. Bergé a legacy to France from Mr. Saint Laurent: a 1791 portrait of a child by Goya.
Maïa de la Baume contributed reporting.

Sunday, February 15, 2009

How to Value Art


The major prerequisite for collecting art and design is an innate desire for the object. While historical, critical and even social context may enrich the story behind an object and explain its conceptual or physical production, it is the initial connection between viewer and object that sets tone and dialogue.


One collector may be drawn to nineteenth-century landscape etchings while another finds value in late twentieth-century color photography; the emotional connection a collector feels towards a work of art or an entire collection creates personal value.
Although personal value and preference may vary greatly, the methods by which one translates an appreciation and passion for art and design into dollars and cents remain the same. A variety of factors must be considered in determining an artwork’s monetary value.
Condition is one of the most important factors in assessing value. Has the object been maintained in the same condition since its creation? If there are changes in the condition, what are they? Have they affected the structure of the object? Have they affected the appearance of the object? Has the object been restored since its inception? If so, has the original integrity of the work been upheld?


Other key elements are the sales and acquisition history (the Provenance) of the object, as well as recent prices realized for similar works by the same artist. This information may be found by looking at public sales records; one efficient and complete tool for finding this information is artnet’s Price Database.
Artworks and design objects may be most effectively assessed by examining the market for similar items, sometimes referred to as “comparables.” Many variables affect the relevance of a comparable, most importantly its sale date. As with any market, the art market is fluid; comparable sales with dates over five years old may have little or no impact on an artwork’s current value. Recent sales indicate the most reliable information in determining the value of a work.
The most accurate evaluation of comparables comes from searching for works within the same medium (painting, sculpture, watercolors, drawing, collages, prints). For example, paintings tend to achieve higher prices than works on paper; the print market is more or less self-contained and specific. Therefore, a print sale, no matter when it occurred, has little relevance in determining the value of a painting, as opposed to the sale of a comparable painting by the same artist that took place during the past year.
The greater the volume of public sales records for an artist, the more important it is to find comparable sales of works within the same criteria. If an artist is new to the auction market and has only ten public sales (in various media), any price realized will be important in determining the value of the work. In the case of an artist whose work has appeared at auction often, and who has perhaps two hundred, or even two thousand sales records, finding an average price for similarly measured, “comparable” works is essential in understanding present value.
Subject matter, or the image depicted in a figurative work, may provide clues to trends within certain genres. For instance, still lifes from the Impressionist era, such as works depicting a bouquet of flowers or a bowl of fruit, have a slightly different market than a landscape painting or a commissioned portrait by the same artist. Thematic factors are combined with creation- or execution-date, followed by medium and size.
Pablo Picasso provides an excellent example of this point. Straddling between figurative and abstract, the works he created between approximately 1908 and 1914 are the product of his investigation into basic geometric elements of form, a method known as Cubism. As these Cubist works differ in style, date and subject matter from his 1940s and 1950s portraits, they also hold very different values.


Rarity is determined by the frequency with which a work by an artist appears on the market, or the number of a specific type of work that is currently available from a particular period in an artist’s career. When combined with demand, rarity becomes very important in appraisal. Visiting Picasso’s career can again be helpful in demonstrating this fact. A naturalistic or figurative Picasso painting from the turn-of-the-(twentieth)-century is extremely rare, compared to a similarly figurative work from the 1920s. Works from the earlier era, referred to as his “Blue Period” – due to the heavy usage of blues and darker, more dramatic hues – rarely come to market. In addition, they are in demand by museums and important collections. Because of these two combined factors, rarity and demand, when a Blue Period painting does appear for sale, its price is very high.


Conversely, works by an artist or from a specific era which appear often and abundantly in public auction sales may achieve lower prices. This is most common when the style or genre falls from fashion, causing less demand. A unique work, such as a painting or sculpture, that has appeared at auction more than once is considered “not fresh” to the market, and often attains much lower value than a work new to the market. A work that appears at auction and fails to sell is considered “Bought-In.” In most cases, when a work has been “Bought-In” recently or repeatedly, the value of that work is adversely affected.Although an artwork’s value is subject to a wide range of variables, these variables are not always relevant. For example, guidelines for insurance or sales appraisals may be more specific than the introductory definitions described above. Or a collector might assign an artwork or design object a value based on a more emotional level. In any case, understanding the background of an object and its current market can serve the buyer in making an educated purchase.